On trend: private debt financing in Germany
If we look at the credit market, focusing on the two major markets of Europe and the U.S., in the last quarter of 2014, 89% of the EUR 10.4 billion in corporate financing was provided as loans and only 11% as capital market instruments, while in the same period 32% of the USD 7.6 billion in corporate financing was provided in the form of loans and 68% via capital market instruments.
Banks dominate corporate financing in Europe. In Germany, just under 70% of corporate financing is provided by banks. As a result of the strict requirements on the capital base of banks as well as the liquidity regulations of the reform package of the Bank for International Settlements known as Basel III, European banks have reduced their lending for corporate loans, real estate loans and project financing, in some cases very sharply.
With the above in mind, I believe that private debt via funds or other investment vehicles, i.e. the money that flows into the credit market via institutional investors, fills a permanent gap. First: In infrastructure, because banks are comfortable at the short end but not at the long end due to restrictive EC and liquidity criteria of banks. SecondIn real estate financing, private debt has a place in mega-deals because decision-making paths have to be short. ThirdIn the field of corporate financing, private debt plays an important role, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, where banks have in some cases withdrawn sharply. Here, private debt often also appears as a mezzanine loan.
The question arises whether the portfolios of credit funds are riskier than a bank’s loan book. From a statistical point of view, there are still no statements on default rates and recovery rates for private debt funds in Europe. I believe that portfolios are riskier by necessity, however, credit fund managers, who are — pardon the slightly limp comparison — “stock pickers,” will select the best exposures through detailed due diligence or credit review and appropriate contracts.
There are, of course, enormous differences in quality and approaches in the private debt business. As everywhere in the private capital market segment, the top priority is the quality of the team (including experience, composition so that all skills necessary for the lending business are present in the team, the length of time team members work together, etc.).
Even more than with other private capital strategies, it is important in the credit business that the processes are precisely defined and structured. It is important to have a credit culture that is focused on building and monitoring a first-class loan book.
In general, conditions in Germany are more favorable than in England, and may be just as competitive as in Scandinavia. The cost of financing through private debt funds can be seen in the table “European private credit market”. The returns that can be achieved in the individual credit market segments consist of several components: a) Interest rate of the loan, b) Fees for the arrangement of the credit, c) fees for early repayments of the loan; and d) Utilization of options granted on shares in companies, etc.
In view of the lack of returns in liquid debt markets, private debt investments are ideal for investors looking to generate ongoing income, especially life insurance companies, pension funds and provident funds. With a view to capital preservation, this asset class is also very popular with family offices and foundations.
According to Solvency II, attractive forms of investment are those that offer relatively high returns as well as a relatively high degree of investment security. This puts the focus on alternative forms of investment such as credit funds, which are based on assets from the real estate or infrastructure sectors, but also on corporate loans. Overall, we see very high demand for loan funds, especially infrastructure loan funds and corporate loan funds.